Dutch MPs against emergency law for no-deal Brexit
Dutch MPs against emergency law for no-deal Brexit
Just about the only clear decision Parliament has made on Brexit since the 2016 referendum was to give formal notice in 2017 to quit, under Article 50 of the European Union’s Lisbon Treaty, a legal process setting it on a two-year path to departure. That set March 29, 2019, as the formal divorce date. David brexit news Michael Davis (born 23 December 1948) is a British Conservative politician who was the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union from the time when the post was created, in the wake of the 2016 EU referendum, until his resignation in July 2018. He has been a Member of Parliament since 1987.
Under this plan, the PM would ask the EU to honour the agreed Brexit transition period, extended for one year, in return for the UK honouring its agreed financial contributions and its commitments on EU citizens’ rights. This would give both sides time to prepare for a departure on WTO terms at the end of 2021 — or to negotiate a different deal. If the attempt to renegotiate the backstop fails, the Malthouse compromise offers a plan B – essentially a managed no-deal. Many soft Brexit and pro-remain MPs are firmly against this as an alternative – leading to some private confusion as to why this has been accepted by MPs such as Morgan and Hammond.
Uk.reuters.com. 13 March 2019. https://www.maximarkets.org/ Sparrow, A. (2016).
The backstop would not apply if the UK left the EU without a deal but the potential problems with the border would remain. It would involve Northern Ireland alone remaining in the EU’s single market and customs union, leaving Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) free to strike trade deals. And if both sides couldn’t reach agreement on a deal keeping the border as open as it is now – that’s where the backstop would come in. Switzerland’s relationship to the EU, which is governed by around 20 major bilateral pacts with the bloc, is broadly similar to the EEA arrangement. Along with these three, Switzerland is a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA).
The referendum turnout was 71.8%, with more than 30 million people voting. The bill will force the prime minister to approach the EU and ask for an extension to the UK’s membership beyond the October 31 Brexit deadline if a deal has not been agreed by October 19.
The “Irish backstop” is effectively an insurance policy in UK-EU Brexit negotiations. It’s meant to make sure that the Irish border remains open (as it is today) whatever the outcome of the UK and the EU’s negotiations about their future relationship after Brexit.
In other words, the UK couldn’t opt out of the Irish backstop if the EU felt that any alternative solution wouldn’t work. Under the backstop the whole of the UK would enter a “single customs territory” with the EU. There are many parts to this but essentially there would be no tariffs on trade in goods between the UK and the EU and some (though not all) brexit news trade restrictions would be removed. The plan was for the government to negotiate our future relationship with the EU, including trade rules, during this transition period. During this period (which would last until, at the latest, December 2022) we’d still be in the single market and customs union, and continue to trade with the EU as we do now.
On 29 March 2017, the UK government invoked Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, formally starting the withdrawal. May called a snap general election in June 2017, which resulted in a Conservative minority government supported by the Democratic Unionist Party. UK–EU withdrawal negotiations began later that month.
- Retrieved 14 April 2019.
- Again – good work, guys.
- Mr. Johnson wants to strike an agreement of his own with Brussels by Oct. 31 — specifically one without the controversial Irish border provisions in Mrs. May’s deal — but that may not be possible.
A UK-wide backstop?
Since the 1975 referendum, the concept of the EU has changed massively – a key claim by leavers is that the UK needs to control immigration once again, something which was largely taken away from the UK government by the EU. I voted Leave specifically because the EU leadership is not only undemocratic, it is actively anti-democractic (a Greek friend recently remarked that the whole Brexit process is, from the RU point of view, “to show you that you have no power, just like Greece”).
The breakdown of the current situation is that the population instructed the government to get us out – and the expectation was that if we couldn’t get a decent deal we would simply walk – and then the government went to the EU and asked them politely what their terms were. Strangely, the terms were all good for the EU and shit for us. Parliament then split between https://www.maximarkets.org/brexit/ those who wanted to take the shit deal, those who wanted to walk away, fantasists who wanted to re-negotiate despite having no leverage, and straight-up Remainers who never wanted to leave. At that point it became impossible to get a majority through and everything stalemated. it passed into law as the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017.
But a third attempt to pass her bill, also in March, failed 344 to 286. Mr. Johnson wants to strike an agreement of his own with Brussels by Oct. 31 — specifically one without the controversial Irish border provisions in Mrs. May’s deal — but that may not be possible.
But earlier this week British Prime Minister Theresa May decided to postpone a House of Commons vote on the deal, coming to the conclusion that the deal will not get enough support. She is now meeting with EU leaders to try and get extra promises in the deal.